
Here the thermal gradient is given by G+
- The division of the volume of casting into numerous pyramidal sectors that originate from the considered point is done. Each of these pyramidal sectors has a solid angle that is small. For the computation of the vector of flux, the content of heat (which is proportional to the volume) and the surface area of cooling are determined for each sector.
- Until and unless the resultant vector of flux becomes zero(or comes approximately close toe zero for the purpose of computation), a step is taken along the direction of the resultant vector of flux, a location which is new is arrived at, and the repetition of the same computation is done.
- The location of the hot spot is the last location so arrived at. The path of feed is taken to be the curve alongside which the repetitions are done.

Fig: The resultant flux vector points to the hot spot
The verification of the method can be done easily for a shape that is 2D. The representation of the length of the vector of flux is done by a/2. Here 'a' denotes the distance between the point at which the ray intersects and the boundary of the casting. The direction of the bisector of the angle of the sector can be taken as the ray's and the vector of flux's direction for that sector.
- In comparison with the FEM or the FDM methods, this method is strong as it takes care of small errors during computation of vector of flux at any point (due to the non-availability of precise thermal and physical data) by automatically correcting them in subsequent repetitions.
- Also the greater efficiency of VEM methods over FDM and FEM methods ( the requirement of memory is low, and are faster by about 10-100 times) in the identification of hot spots in castings that are quite complex shaped, is established.
Fig: Top: Simple casting along with the feeder; middle: Solidification with directions (path of feed); bottom: forward moving solidification in the section that is at the centre.






